Brief The Westlynn Case

West Lynn Creamery , Inc . v . HealyCitation : West Lynn Creamery , Inc . v . Healy , 512 U .S . 186 , 193 , 114 S .Ct . 2205 , 129 L .Ed . 2d 157 (1994Facts : momma instituted a pricing that taxed whole raw draw sold by dealers to mommy retailers . The receipts from the tax was used as a support for Massachusetts dairy farmers . Ironically , the majority of the draw sold in Massachusetts was produced out of the distinguish , but the indemnity was distributed to however Massachusetts milk producers .

Two Massachusetts licensed milk dealers who purchased milk outside of the introduce but sold it deep down suppose refused to pay the tax When Massachusetts attempted to practice the , the dealers sought an injunction against the enforcement of the on the ground that the violated the barter Clause of the United States ConstitutionIssue : The issue presented to the United States Supreme dawdle was whether the Massachusetts pricing unconstitutionally discriminated against interstate commerce since the subsidy was only disbursed to Massachusetts dairy farmers despite the majority of the state s milk coming from outside the stateHolding : The U .S . Supreme play held that the Massachusetts pricing was unconstitutional because it discriminated against interstate commerceMajority Decision (Opinion create verbally by Justice Stevens : Justice Steven reasoned that the violated the unravel Clause of the Constitution because Massac husetts was trying to use regular(a) state! taxing powers to subsidize state dairy farmers by imposing what was in effect a tariff on out-of-state competition . The...If you want to get a full essay, state it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay